Letter to Students: Specially for smart readers.
Please do not complain…there is ‘no problem’ with ‘education’
Statutory warning: If you read this letter and get offended, I will not be considered responsible for it because I have told you to be a smart reader in the letter itself. If you think that you can be easily offended, please ignore this letter.
Statutory warning: If you read this letter and get offended, I will not be considered responsible for it because I have told you to be a smart reader in the letter itself. If you think that you can be easily offended, please ignore this letter.
This seems to be a perpetual question that appears every now
and then and the issue is refueled when you cite so called successful college
drop-outs like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. It is our tendency to focus on
success (and who defines success?) and ignore failures (again, who defines
failure?), otherwise you would have cited millions of other college drop-outs
who are not so successful in the eyes of our (read ‘your’) perceived society.
Let me present some of my views on what you are gaining
through higher education.
1. A highly structured and directive learning
The education in higher institutes tend to be so directive
and structured (thanks to accreditation agencies and regulators), that it
frames your minds, conditions your thinking and frames your intellect. Wait a
minute…does it appear negative to you? Come on…do you not agree that If you do
not demonstrate specified learning objectives set for the course by the faculty,
you will not get any credit and will be labelled as a failure in a particular course.
Believe me there is no problem, this situation will continue unless you assert …wait
professor…I do not like these learning objectives…why should I achieve these? I
have not developed these for my learning. Your faculty developed these without
asking me. But are you enrolled in higher education institutes by paying a
hefty fee to develop learning objectives? No…come on….leave it to us…just
follow what we give to you. Do not take the ‘extra’ pain…no need.
Ignore this part – ‘it is too verbose’: you are a smart
reader – are not you? Well, the real problem
lies not in students’ failure to demonstrate the achievement of specified
objectives, but in fixed and specified learning objectives developed by so
called intellectuals and imposed on students with the expectation that they
will take an ownership of these objectives. Are academicians justified with the
expectation of ownership of learning by students? The problem is that students
are expected to take something designed by others. And, that’s why they just
take it. The relationship between students and teachers is like giver and
taker. The teachers give so called knowledge to students and students take it.
This is evident when educational researchers found that most of the students
use a strategic learning approach to get the degree and they get it. Or they
just learn what they are taught.
Oh! Did you read the above paragraph? So, where is the
problem? No problem at all. Are you not happy with the structured and directive
learning? Are not you comfortable because you know that you will fit well in
this world, earn good amount of money and will be termed as successful in eyes
of others (which reflects your vision too!) with the ‘training’ you are
receiving in higher ‘education’ institutes?
2. A degree
Let me tell you a story…you love stories…don’t you? Origin
of universities - The institution called
‘universities’ were not set up by intellectuals to teach students in order to
frame and condition their minds according to the perceived needs of society.
The first universities came into being from students who formed community for their
own learning and they used to hire and fire faculty members. They used to have
full ownership of learning. This situation changed when universities started
providing degrees. The moment the degree granting practice started, faculty became
more powerful than students’ community and started dictating the terms. It
means that the faculty under the influence of those who fund them started
deciding what to teach, how to teach, what not to teach and how not to teach.
But, why should you care? There is no problem…just ignore
the above paragraph… do you not want to be rich to fund universities in future?
A ‘successful’ and rich business man who need ‘trained’ students to work in
your company or further your ‘business’ ‘your way’? So…where is the problem? No
problem at all.
3. Higher education or training
There is a plethora of
articles on difference between education and training in internet. One Google
search is enough to find the difference. But, wait…..how to search in Google is
training and how to interpret and use the results (and how not to!) and how to
apply learning from this practice in your life is education. In simple words,
training provides skills which are necessary to perform a task and education
provides wisdom to decide whether you need such a training or not. The problem
is that most of the academics know the difference but, in most educational
institutes, we provide training to equip students for the ‘real’ world. And
this real world is what we tell you, instead of you making your own sense of world.
Wait a minute…how can you students with no expertise can make meanings unless
we teach you how to do this too... If you start making free will meanings then
it will create problem to our community of educators and experts. If you act as
experts who will give importance to our expertise we earned after so much
investment in our ‘education’? We need to carry on with our ‘tradition’. We should
never lose our power… And, this is the reason, the structured and directive
teaching is designed with the power of providing degree and credit so that the
learning is proved as assured according to what is specified by us….the powerful
faculty.
Wait… did you read the above paragraph too? If yes, you are
not smart! Believe me there is no problem that is evident anywhere.
The problem appears when we try to use a critical approach.
And, I have noticed in my 10 years of experience in academics that the critical
thinking is lacking among so called intellectuals and students in the present
era. The reason is our conditioned mind that accepts everything that is
presented to us.
Don’t you seek structures, definitions, clear instructions, frameworks,
concepts developed by others? Do you challenge existing definition, frameworks
and concepts? Don’t you love to hear stories of so called expert practitioners
and researchers/academics who provide their subjective knowledge as the ultimate knowledge
to you well-structured in a spoon…sorry ‘spoon’ is taboo..? Let me use another
word….fill your ‘empty’ glass of knowledge with our ‘wisdom’. Are you not happy
with whatever so called experts tell (well sometimes after little challenge
from you but eventually you give up!)…you love downloading the knowledge…from our
minds to your mind in a directive, straight forward manner or sometimes
indirectly from so called teaching and learning tools like cases, projects,
lectures etc. (as education is a task and we need tools to make it easy to complete)!
using established frameworks and concepts, we tell and you accept what is
acceptable in the world and what is not, and how the world works and how you
should work and behave. Don’t you see us as knowledge providers? No need to change
the status quo. Let us enjoy the power and prestige in such a relationship. You
should always feel that you are not knowledgeable enough, lack experience and
expertise (and thus lack confidence!) After all you are students! Have you seen
any faculty member who ask you to develop your own frameworks, your own
concepts and definitions instead of applying the existing ones? (And if your answer
is yes, ignore such a crazy professor…he is fake….he has no ‘knowledge’ to ‘give’
it to you!)
Ignore next paragraph too – remember – smart reading!
The real challenge for
educators in this era is to instill in students the confidence and habit of critical
thinking. Do academics have guts to tell students that whatever they are being
told includes few subjective perspectives and not complete knowledge because
the real learning and knowledge cannot get transferred from experts and cannot
be downloaded in mind. Can we tell them that they are in fact receiving training
in so called educational institutes so that they can get fit into the world (like
cogs in a wheel/bricks in a wall – courtesy to Pink Floyd! Let us be happy…do
students really understand the meaning of the Pink Floyd song?) My view is that
the real education is there where students no longer depend on degrees,
universities and teachers. Students design their own learning needs, find their
own resources for learning, evaluate themselves or among peers, listen to all
practitioners and researchers, but acknowledge that OK it is their perspective,
their experience, their learning and their views, but we as students need to
construct our own learning by freeing from existing frameworks and definitions.
Of course, it first requires understanding the existing concepts and
frameworks, otherwise how can one make herself free if she does not know
properly the shackles binding her.
Did you read above paragraph too? You are not so smart. If you really think that
you have received real education or if you think there is no way you can get
the real education in universities, the best you can get is just training and
you are educated enough to know that you do not need this training in the name
of education, because you know how to self-learn independently and for
life-long duration (and a high paying occupation for yourself)! It is better to
drop-out before your minds also gets conditioned permanently. Or, ask from your
professors…OK prof…this is what you told us/books mention/experts recommend
about this…. But let me tell you how I constructed my learning from various
resources and inputs and believe me more than half of what you told me is
really bull sh…! Wait a minute…how can you talk to your professor like this…you
do need to pass, don’t you? But, do you at least feel this?
True education provides capability of independent and
lifelong self-learning. Wait! What I mentioned? Self-learning? Imagine if
students are so much educated and developed in high schools that they do not
need degrees and universities’ for further learning. Will it not change many
things in this world? Now, it is a problem… How the universities will survive then?
And wait a minute….I forgot I am a faculty member too! I should stop writing
now…it is becoming dangerous! Go back to your class….listen to your professors…..find
a good job or start a business and be ‘successful’ and yes, ignore this letter
please! I am sure you will read this last paragraph…smart readers!
Very well written Prof. Anand! I know not how serious the present generation is about the independent thinking. Neither they are taught to think independently nor is it demanded during their job. For instance, an IT professional writes the same codes and only customize them as per the industry. Even researchers like us are using the same tools. How many of us are inventing new statistical tools to address a new business problem? Thus, there is a overall stagnancy in the vertical growth though we are all growing horizontally/ laterally. As far as the way outs are concerned, we have to practice thinking independently without getting conditioned from our past knowledge and experience. It's difficult but possible.
ReplyDeleteDear Tuhin,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments. I agree to your views completely. But I wonder what are we doing as academics to address this issue. I have not been much successful in this till now.